The Supreme Court stated in its verdict for the Place of Worship Act 1991 in the Babri Masjid Ayodhya dispute case that this activity is relevant to secularism and India's basic structure. The Muslim school of thought has condemned the Varanasi court's ruling as erroneous, and expects the Muslim Personal Law Board and those affiliated with the management of the Gyanvapi Masjid to immediately petition the Supreme Court, claiming that its directives are being disobeyed. The BJP and RSS are reigniting "the period of hatred" of the 1990s. It has once again demonstrated that the Indian judiciary works in tandem with the RSS. This time, it's assisting RSS in keeping a commitment it made a long time ago.
On 29 August, 1984, the RSS established the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) in Mumbai. A World Hindu Sammelan (conference) was organised in Allahabad in 1986. The VHP eventually adopted an 18-point code of conduct that specifically called for the "liberation" of Ram's and Krishna's birthplaces in Ayodhya and Mathura, as well as the "liberation" of Varanasi's Kashi Vishwanath Mandir from the Gyanvapi Masjid." The Varanasi court is merely assisting the RSS in destroying Gyanvapi Masjid now that Babri Masjid has been "liberated".
The Constitution cannot help Muslims in defending themselves from the direct attack on their very presence in India. The attack on mosques is actually an attack on the existence of Muslims. In such a situation, getting involved in legal acrobats is a trap laid by those who don’t want a systematic change. When they say it’s against the constitution, it implies that the fault lies in the court rather than the system itself. This way, nothing really changes.
A new break-way state will stablish from India again.
ReplyDeleteWeldone
ReplyDelete